PRO A4-8350B vs i3-1115G4E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1115G4E
2020, $285
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.99
+211%

Core i3-1115G4E outperforms PRO A4-8350B by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18752739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.80no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.420.62
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020−2021)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)29 September 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$285no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die size144 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1449FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, LPDDR4XDDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardUHD Graphics G4 48EUAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes416

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-1115G4E 2.99
+211%
PRO A4-8350B 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-1115G4E 5231
+210%
Samples: 15
PRO A4-8350B 1690
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.99 0.96
Recency 2 September 2020 29 September 2015
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

i3-1115G4E has a 211.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A4-8350B in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-1115G4E is a notebook processor while PRO A4-8350B is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115G4E
Core i3-1115G4E
AMD PRO A4-8350B
PRO A4-8350B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate PRO A4-8350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-1115G4E and PRO A4-8350B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.