Celeron N3000 vs i3-1115G4E
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-1115G4E outperforms Celeron N3000 by a whopping 724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1778 | 3232 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.34 | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 8.57 | 3.90 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 2 September 2020 (5 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $285 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-1115G4E has 21600% better value for money than Celeron N3000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.04 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.08 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | IDI |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 144 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, LPDDR4X | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | UHD Graphics G4 48EU | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 600 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | + |
| OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Celeron N3000.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.05 | 0.37 |
| Recency | 2 September 2020 | 1 April 2015 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 4 Watt |
i3-1115G4E has a 724.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N3000, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i3-1115G4E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N3000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
