Xeon X3320 vs Core i3-10105F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1059	2192
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.14	0.23
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Architecture codename	Comet Lake-R (2021)	no data
Release date	16 March 2021 (3 years ago)	1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price	$95	$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10105F has 19961% better value for money than Xeon X3320.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	8	no data
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.4 GHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	6 MB (shared)	6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA1200	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
SIPP	-	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
FSB parity	no data	-
Status	Launched	Discontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	no data
Maximum memory size	128 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	-	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon X3320 by 355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	5.82	1.28
Recency	16 March 2021	1 January 2008
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon X3320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---