Xeon Gold 6142 vs i3-10105F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.88
Xeon Gold 6142
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
16.48
+180%

Xeon Gold 6142 outperforms Core i3-10105F by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1129418
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.51
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.2510.02
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$2,946

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.88
Xeon Gold 6142 16.48
+180%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8992
Xeon Gold 6142 25215
+180%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.88 16.48
Recency 16 March 2021 25 April 2017
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

i3-10105F has an age advantage of 3 years, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6142, on the other hand, has a 180.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6142 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10105F in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6142 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon Gold 6142, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon Gold 6142
Xeon Gold 6142

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3569 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon Gold 6142, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.