Xeon E5-4640 v4 vs i3-10105F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
Xeon E5-4640 v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
14.20
+151%

Xeon E5-4640 v4 outperforms Core i3-10105F by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1148511
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency8.2312.80
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$2,837

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads824
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate8 GT/s2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
Xeon E5-4640 v4 14.20
+151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8972
Xeon E5-4640 v4 22559
+151%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 14.20
Recency 16 March 2021 20 June 2016
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 24
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 105 Watt

i3-10105F has an age advantage of 4 years, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4640 v4, on the other hand, has a 151.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon E5-4640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10105F in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4640 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-4640 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon E5-4640 v4
Xeon E5-4640 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3670 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon E5-4640 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.