Xeon E5-1620 vs Core i3-10105F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1050	1387
Place by popularity	53	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	46.14	4.22
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Architecture codename	Comet Lake-R (2021)	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date	16 March 2021 (3 years ago)	March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$313
Current price	$96	$44 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10105F has 993% better value for money than Xeon E5-1620.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	8
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.4 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	6 MB (shared)	10240 KB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	294 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1270 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1200	FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® AVX
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	no data
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	-
SIPP	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Status	Launched	Discontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR3
Maximum memory size	128 GB	375 GB
Max memory channels	2	4
Maximum memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 by 54% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	5.77	3.75
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	130 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon E5-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---