Xeon E3-1230 v2 vs i3-10105F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
+44.9%
Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
3.90

Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v2 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11471453
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.72
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.235.35
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$360

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt69 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB32.77 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
+44.9%
Xeon E3-1230 v2 3.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8971
+44.7%
Xeon E3-1230 v2 6199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 3.90
Recency 16 March 2021 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 69 Watt

i3-10105F has a 44.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 6.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v2 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1230 v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon E3-1230 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3657 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2763 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon E3-1230 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.