FX-8320E vs i3-10105F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
+81.1%
FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.12

Core i3-10105F outperforms FX-8320E by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11471627
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.223.11
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$147

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
+81.1%
FX-8320E 3.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8971
+80.9%
FX-8320E 4960

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-10105F 1471
+236%
FX-8320E 438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-10105F 4526
+169%
FX-8320E 1685

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 3.12
Recency 16 March 2021 2 September 2014
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

i3-10105F has a 81.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

FX-8320E, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and FX-8320E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3669 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1117 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or FX-8320E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.