Celeron M U3600 vs i3-10105F

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1147not rated
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency8.23no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s2500 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2021 18 December 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

i3-10105F has an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M U3600, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Celeron M U3600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Celeron M U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3662 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.