Celeron 725C vs i3-10105F
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1132 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 55 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 8.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 16 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $97 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2021 | 1 July 2011 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
i3-10105F has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 725C, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Celeron 725C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Celeron 725C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
