A4-6300 vs i3-10105F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
+528%
A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90

Core i3-10105F outperforms A4-6300 by a whopping 528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11472550
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.231.31
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and A4-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and A4-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-10105F and A4-6300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and A4-6300.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
+528%
A4-6300 0.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8971
+528%
A4-6300 1428

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-10105F 1471
+271%
A4-6300 396

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-10105F 4524
+704%
A4-6300 563

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 0.90
Recency 16 March 2021 1 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

i3-10105F has a 527.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and A4-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
AMD A4-6300
A4-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3659 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 285 votes

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or A4-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.