i7-13705H vs i3-10100F
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13705H outperforms Core i3-10100F by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1164 | 482 |
| Place by popularity | 18 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.82 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 8.01 | 30.96 |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 12 October 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | $502 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.46 | 14.62 |
| Recency | 12 October 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 8 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
i7-13705H has a 167.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 250% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-13705H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10100F in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-10100F is a desktop processor while Core i7-13705H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10100F and Core i7-13705H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
