Celeron N6211 vs i3-10100F

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.44
+289%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.40

Core i3-10100F outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 289% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12092272
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.233.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency7.9720.51
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date12 October 2020 (4 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10100F has 508% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-10100F 5.44
+289%
Celeron N6211 1.40

  • Passmark
  • Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10100F 8725
+289%
Celeron N6211 2245

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i3-10100F 3650
+332%
Celeron N6211 844

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.44 1.40
Recency 12 October 2020 17 July 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

i3-10100F has a 288.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7867 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-10100F and Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.