Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Core i3-10100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.59
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.68
+181%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms i3-10100 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1105418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.60no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameComet Lake-S (2020)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cache6 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size126 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10100 5.59
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.68
+181%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

i3-10100 8653
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24256
+180%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 180% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

i3-10100 1426
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1950
+36.7%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 37% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

i3-10100 4215
Ryzen 7 8840HS 8617
+104%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 104% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-10100 895
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2111
+136%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 136% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-10100 181
Ryzen 7 8840HS 265
+46.1%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-10100 by 46% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.59 15.68
Integrated graphics card 3.09 18.29
Recency 30 April 2020 6 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840HS has a 180.5% higher aggregate performance score, 491.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10100 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10100 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10100
Core i3-10100
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2815 votes

Rate Core i3-10100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 81 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10100 or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.