Celeron T3100 vs i3-1005G1
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1617 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | no data |
Power efficiency | 19.51 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) | no data |
Release date | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
Threads | 4 | no data |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
Bus type | OPI | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 12 | no data |
L1 cache | 160 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1526 | BGA479,PGA478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | - |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 59.732 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 5120 x 3200@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 5120 x 3200@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 August 2019 | 1 July 2008 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
i3-1005G1 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-1005G1 and Celeron T3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.