Processor N95 vs Core i3-1000NG4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1000NG4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 9 Watt
2.34
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 15 Watt
3.10
+32.5%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17051534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameIce Lake-YAlder Lake-N
Release date18 March 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed1.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Die size123 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1044Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)9 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4-3733DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth58.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Plus GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportYes, at 120Hzno data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-1000NG4 2.34
Processor N95 3.10
+32.5%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-1000NG4 5771
+20.7%
Processor N95 4783

Core i3-1000NG4 outperforms Processor N95 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-1000NG4 9257
Processor N95 13854
+49.7%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 50% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-1000NG4 3151
Processor N95 5952
+88.9%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 89% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-1000NG4 16.2
+5.2%
Processor N95 17.04

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 5% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-1000NG4 3
Processor N95 6
+104%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 104% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-1000NG4 333
Processor N95 445
+33.6%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 34% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-1000NG4 141
Processor N95 151
+7.1%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 7% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-1000NG4 1.49
Processor N95 1.83
+22.8%

Processor N95 outperforms Core i3-1000NG4 by 23% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-1000NG4 2468
+6.4%
Processor N95 2320

Core i3-1000NG4 outperforms Processor N95 by 6% in WinRAR 4.0.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.34 3.10
Recency 18 March 2020 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Power consumption (TDP) 9 Watt 15 Watt

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-1000NG4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-1000NG4 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1000NG4
Core i3-1000NG4
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 58 votes

Rate Core i3-1000NG4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 486 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-1000NG4 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.