EPYC Embedded 2875 vs Ultra X7 368H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking394not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency31.22no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenamePanther Lake (2026)Grado (2025)
Release date5 January 2026 (recently)9 December 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads1632
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2540FL1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR5X-9600DDR5
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ B390 GPUAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.5 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimateno data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1228

Pros & cons summary


Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

Ultra X7 368H has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 2875, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and AMD EPYC Embedded 2875. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra X7 368H is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 2875 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Core Ultra X7 368H
AMD EPYC Embedded 2875
EPYC Embedded 2875

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra X7 368H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 2875 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra X7 368H and EPYC Embedded 2875, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.