Xeon W-1370P vs Ultra X7 358H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra X7 358H outperforms Xeon W-1370P by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 382 | 652 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 18.80 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 32.27 | 4.53 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Panther Lake (2026) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| Release date | no data | 6 May 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $428 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 4 | no data |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 18 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 276 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2540 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR5X-9600 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 96 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 50 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ B390 GPU | Intel UHD Graphics P750 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.5 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 32 |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Xeon W-1370P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.12 | 13.43 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ultra X7 358H has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 400% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-1370P in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Ultra X7 358H is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1370P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
