A8 PRO-7600B vs Ultra X7 358H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra X7 358H
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
19.21
+1017%

Core Ultra X7 358H outperforms A8 PRO-7600B by a whopping 1017% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3792286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency32.421.12
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenamePanther Lake (2026)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateno data31 July 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads164
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cache18 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithographyno data28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2540FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR5X-9600DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ B390 GPUAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Quick Sync Video+-
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency2.5 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX 12 UltimateDirectX® 12
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra X7 358H 19.21
+1017%
A8 PRO-7600B 1.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra X7 358H 34452
+1044%
Samples: 76
A8 PRO-7600B 3011
Samples: 176

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.21 1.72
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra X7 358H has a 1017% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8 PRO-7600B in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra X7 358H is a notebook processor while A8 PRO-7600B is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 votes

Rate Core Ultra X7 358H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 210 votes

Rate A8 PRO-7600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra X7 358H and A8 PRO-7600B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.