EPYC 9336 vs Ultra 9 295HX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX (2025−2026) | Venice (2004−2026) |
| Release date | no data | 23 July 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,320 |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.15 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 2 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 165 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 101,500 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 195 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 295HX and EPYC 9336.
| PCIe version | no data | 6.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 32 |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 195 Watt |
Ultra 9 295HX has 255% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9336, on the other hand, has 33% more physical cores and 167% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX and AMD EPYC 9336. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Ultra 9 295HX is a notebook processor while EPYC 9336 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
