Xeon Gold 6326 vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiencyno data4.30
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date17 March 2026 (recently)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 2114FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes2464

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 290HX Plus 66082
+101%
Samples: 2
Xeon Gold 6326 32820
Samples: 15

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2026 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 24 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 185 Watt

Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 236.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Intel Xeon Gold 6326. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 31 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.