Xeon 6724P vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiencyno data5.85
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date17 March 2026 (recently)24 February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,622

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)72 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketIntel BGA 2114FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 290HX Plus 66082
+29.7%
Samples: 2
Xeon 6724P 50959
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2026 24 February 2025
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 210 Watt

Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, and 281.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6724P, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Intel Xeon 6724P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while Xeon 6724P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Intel Xeon 6724P
Xeon 6724P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6724P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Xeon 6724P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.