EPYC 9175F vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 18 | 109 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.90 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.96 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 17 March 2026 (recently) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,256 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 512 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 16x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 133,040 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2114 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 9175F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 March 2026 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 320 Watt |
Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 481.8% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and AMD EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
