EPYC 74F3 vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
2026
24 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
35.02
EPYC 74F3
2021, $2,900
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
35.44
+1.2%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking151144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.42
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency26.186.07
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date17 March 2026 (less than a year ago)15 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads2448
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache192 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm+
Die size243 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA2114SP3
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 290HX Plus 35.02
EPYC 74F3 35.44
+1.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 290HX Plus 59949
Samples: 82
EPYC 74F3 60666
+1.2%
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.02 35.44
Recency 17 March 2026 15 March 2021
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 240 Watt

Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 336% lower power consumption.

EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and AMD EPYC 74F3.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 41 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.