Xeon Platinum 8481C vs Ultra 9 285K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
42.99
+485%
Xeon Platinum 8481C
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
7.35

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Xeon Platinum 8481C by a whopping 485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking54986
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency32.551.99
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads24112
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate250 MHzno data
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Die size243 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA18514677
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285K 42.99
+485%
Xeon Platinum 8481C 7.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285K 68291
+485%
Xeon Platinum 8481C 11681

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.99 7.35
Recency 24 October 2024 10 January 2023
Physical cores 24 56
Threads 24 112
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 350 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has a 484.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8481C, on the other hand, has 133.3% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8481C in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8481C is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8481C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Xeon Platinum 8481C
Xeon Platinum 8481C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 170 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8481C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Xeon Platinum 8481C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.