Am486DX4-75SV8B vs Ultra 9 285K

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Am486
Power efficiency32.46no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)80486 (1989)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads24no data
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.7 GHz0.08 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate250 MHz25 MT/s
Multiplierno data3
L1 cache112 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm500 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardno data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 1
Chip lithography 3 nm 500 nm

Ultra 9 285K has 2300% more physical cores, and a 16566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Am486DX4-75SV8B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Am486DX4-75SV8B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD Am486DX4-75SV8B
Am486DX4-75SV8B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Am486DX4-75SV8B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Am486DX4-75SV8B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.