Ryzen Threadripper 2950X vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.46
+16.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
2018, $899
16 cores / 32 threads, 180 Watt
16.70

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2950X by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking348439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.496.45
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency18.373.94
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)ZEN+ (2018−2019)
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285H has 326% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache192 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)32 MB
Chip lithography3 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2049Socket TR4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4 Quad-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data93.867 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPU-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)-
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2-
OpenGL4.6-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.46
+16.5%
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 34311
+16.5%
Samples: 801
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 29451
Samples: 979

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ultra 9 285H 2613
+109%
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 1253

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ultra 9 285H 14831
+75.7%
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 8443

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.46 16.70
Recency 13 January 2025 13 August 2018
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 16.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 285H is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 115 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 68 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen Threadripper 2950X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.