Ryzen 5 7535HS vs Ultra 9 285H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
20.42
+80.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.29

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen 5 7535HS by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking303762
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency43.4430.88
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2024−2025)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date6 January 2024 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads1612
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache24 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes2820
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 20.42
+80.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 32761
+80.9%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18106

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15435
+105%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 7521

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285H 6069
+11.6%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 5438

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285H 56987
+27.1%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 44821

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 9 285H 1993
+41.5%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1409

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 285H 289
+47.2%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 196

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 9 285H 379
Ryzen 5 7535HS 642
+69.3%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 16369
+92%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8527

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285H 2847
+40.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 2022

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15330
+79.8%
Ryzen 5 7535HS 8527

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.42 11.29
Recency 6 January 2024 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 80.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 27 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1783 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.