Processor U300 vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.44
+290%
Processor U300
2023, $193
5 cores / 6 threads, 15 Watt
4.98

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Processor U300 by a whopping 290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3521388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.4517.94
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency46.3235.60
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 9 285H has 53% better value for money than Processor U300.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads166
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1100 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes248

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.44
+290%
Processor U300 4.98

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 9 285H 11459
+28.8%
Processor U300 8897

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 9 285H 74797
+198%
Processor U300 25107

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 9 285H 3137
+302%
Processor U300 781

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 9 285H 311
+40.1%
Processor U300 222

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 9 285H 9.5
+102%
Processor U300 4.7

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 9 285H 181
+246%
Processor U300 52

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 9 285H 360
+66.5%
Processor U300 216

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15435
+310%
Processor U300 3764

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285H 6069
+25.2%
Processor U300 4847

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285H 56987
+200%
Processor U300 18979

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 285H 289
+46.3%
Processor U300 197

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 9 285H 379
Processor U300 1362
+259%

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 16369
+275%
Processor U300 4369

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285H 2847
+39.5%
Processor U300 2041

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 4.98
Recency 13 January 2025 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 5
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 3 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 290.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 220% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Processor U300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 116 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 19 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Processor U300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.