Celeron N2830 vs Ultra 9 285H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 6177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 348 | 3334 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 27.49 | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 18.37 | 1.88 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-H (2025) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 23 February 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $651 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ultra 9 285H has 274800% better value for money than Celeron N2830.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Performance-cores | 6 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 2 | no data |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| RST | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ 140T GPU | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.35 GHz | 750 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 2 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Celeron N2830.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.46 | 0.31 |
| Recency | 13 January 2025 | 23 February 2014 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 7 Watt |
Ultra 9 285H has a 6177.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N2830, on the other hand, has 542.9% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N2830 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
