Athlon 5350 vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.69
+1812%

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Athlon 5350 by a whopping 1812% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3642720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.71no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency18.461.74
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date13 January 2025 (1 year ago)9 April 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads164
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.05 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz2.05 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049AM1
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data128
Quick Sync Video+-
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.6no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes244

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.69
+1812%
Athlon 5350 1.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 34266
+1808%
Samples: 1793
Athlon 5350 1796
Samples: 693

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ultra 9 285H 2604
+1140%
Athlon 5350 210

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ultra 9 285H 14764
+2305%
Athlon 5350 614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.69 1.03
Recency 13 January 2025 9 April 2014
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 1812% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 5350, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 5350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 285H is a notebook processor while Athlon 5350 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 218 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 80 votes

Rate Athlon 5350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Athlon 5350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.