A10-4655M vs Ultra 9 285H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
23.31
+2163%
A10-4655M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.03

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms A10-4655M by a whopping 2163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2292477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency49.333.92
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HTrinity (2012−2013)
Release dateno data15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads164
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
L3 cache24 MB0 KB
Chip lithographyno data32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FP2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400unknown Dual-channel
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUAMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M.

PCI Express lanes28no data
PCI support5.0 and 4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285H 23.31
+2163%
A10-4655M 1.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 37343
+2152%
A10-4655M 1658

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.31 1.03
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 2163.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A10-4655M, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285H is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-4655M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285H and A10-4655M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD A10-4655M
A10-4655M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate A10-4655M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285H or A10-4655M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.