EPYC 4564P vs Ultra 9 185H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.40
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.36
+114%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.66
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency38.9922.08
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$640$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2232
Base clock speed3.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049AM5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 185H 18.40
EPYC 4564P 39.36
+114%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 185H 29467
EPYC 4564P 63036
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.40 39.36
Integrated graphics card 18.51 1.99
Recency 14 December 2023 21 May 2024
Threads 22 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 170 Watt

Ultra 9 185H has 830.2% faster integrated GPU, and 277.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 113.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, 45.5% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 185H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 185H and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 439 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 185H or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.