Xeon Platinum 8160 vs Ultra 7 366H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 366H
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
19.54
+16.4%
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017, $4,702
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
16.79

Core Ultra 7 366H outperforms Xeon Platinum 8160 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking362460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.92
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency33.164.73
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePanther Lake (2026)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release dateno data25 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,702

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads1648
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 cacheno data24 MB
L3 cache18 MB Intel® Smart Cache33 MB
Chip lithographyno data14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2540FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.5 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimateno data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes2048

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 366H 19.54
+16.4%
Xeon Platinum 8160 16.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 366H 34222
+16.3%
Samples: 4
Xeon Platinum 8160 29419
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.54 16.79
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 16 48
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

Ultra 7 366H has a 16.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8160, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 366H is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8160 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
Core Ultra 7 366H
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160
Xeon Platinum 8160

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 366H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 366H and Xeon Platinum 8160, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.