EPYC 9015 vs Ultra 7 270HX Plus
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 37 | 439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 29.15 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 5.88 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 17 March 2026 (recently) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $527 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2114 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and EPYC 9015.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 March 2026 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 125 Watt |
Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an age advantage of 1 year, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and AMD EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus is a notebook processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
