Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Ultra 7 265U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 265U
2025
12 cores / 14 threads, 57 Watt
10.21
+296%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.58

Core Ultra 7 265U outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by a whopping 296% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7751763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency17.079.83
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores2no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads144
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.8 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2049FP5
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes208
PCI support4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 265U 10.21
+296%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 2.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 265U 16356
+296%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 4135

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 2.58
Recency 1 January 2025 25 February 2020
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 14 4
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 7 265U has a 295.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 500% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G, on the other hand, has 128% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 265U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265U and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Core Ultra 7 265U
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1606G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265U or Ryzen Embedded R1606G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.