Processor N95 vs Ultra 7 265U
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 265U outperforms Processor N95 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 775 | 1648 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Power efficiency | 17.07 | 19.95 |
Architecture codename | no data | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Performance-cores | 2 | no data |
Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
Low Power Efficient-cores | 2 | no data |
Threads | 14 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 12 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA2049 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 2.1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 4 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 9 |
PCI support | 4.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.21 | 3.14 |
Recency | 1 January 2025 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 12 | 4 |
Threads | 14 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ultra 7 265U has a 225.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
Processor N95, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 7 265U is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N95 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265U and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.