EPYC 9734 vs Ultra 7 265U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency17.07no data
Architecture codenameno dataBergamo (2023)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,600

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)112
Performance-cores2no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads14224
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data8x 73 mm2
Number of transistorsno data71,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA2049SP5
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes20128
PCI support4.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2025 13 June 2023
Physical cores 12 112
Threads 14 224
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 340 Watt

Ultra 7 265U has an age advantage of 1 year, and 496.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9734, on the other hand, has 833.3% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 265U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9734 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265U and EPYC 9734, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Core Ultra 7 265U
AMD EPYC 9734
EPYC 9734

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9734 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265U or EPYC 9734, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.