Celeron N3350E vs Ultra 7 265U
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 775 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 17.07 | no data |
| Release date | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 1 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Performance-cores | 2 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 8 | no data |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | 2 | no data |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | Intel 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Smart Idle | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.1 GHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | + |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 6 |
| PCI support | 4.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2025 | 1 July 2019 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 57 Watt | 6 Watt |
Ultra 7 265U has an age advantage of 5 years, and 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads.
Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265U and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
