A6-9230 SoC vs Ultra 7 265U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking775not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.07no data
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores2no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads142
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB (shared)
L3 cache12 MBno data
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FT4
Power consumption (TDP)57 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsRadeon R4 3CU
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes208
PCI support4.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2025 31 May 2016
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 14 2
Power consumption (TDP) 57 Watt 25 Watt

Ultra 7 265U has an age advantage of 8 years, and 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

A6-9230 SoC, on the other hand, has 128% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 265U is a notebook processor while A6-9230 SoC is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265U and A6-9230 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Core Ultra 7 265U
AMD A6-9230 SoC
A6-9230 SoC

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-9230 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265U or A6-9230 SoC, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.