EPYC 9535 vs Ultra 7 265KF

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking73not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency29.53no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Turin (2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (recently)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379$8,992

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads20128
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die size243 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1851SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 20 64
Threads 20 128
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 300 Watt

Ultra 7 265KF has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has 220% more physical cores and 540% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop processor while EPYC 9535 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC 9535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF
AMD EPYC 9535
EPYC 9535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 24 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265KF or EPYC 9535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.