Xeon 6980E+ vs Ultra 7 265F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 236 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 47.79 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 18.25 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Clearwater Forest (2026) |
| Release date | 7 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 31 May 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 264 |
| Performance-cores | 8 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 12 | no data |
| Threads | 20 | 264 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 528 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1851 | 7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and Xeon 6980E+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2025 | 31 May 2026 |
| Physical cores | 20 | 264 |
| Threads | 20 | 264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 400 Watt |
Ultra 7 265F has 515% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6980E+, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1220% more physical cores and 1220% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and Intel Xeon 6980E+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop processor while Xeon 6980E+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
