MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Ultra 7 265F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 265F
2025
20 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
31.09
+1906%
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
2022
8 cores / 8 threads
1.55

Core Ultra 7 265F outperforms MediaTek Kompanio 1300T by a whopping 1906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1532214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation77.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMediatek
Power efficiency45.81no data
DesignerIntelno data
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
Release date7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)9 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores12no data
Threads208
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache30 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm6 nm
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR4
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AARM Mali-G77 MP9

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.09 1.55
Recency 7 January 2025 9 March 2022
Physical cores 20 8
Threads 20 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 6 nm

Ultra 7 265F has a 1905.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is our recommended choice as it beats the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop processor while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Kompanio 1300T

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 1300T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 265F and MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.