Xeon 6516P-B vs Ultra 7 265

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking161not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.19no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency42.40no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
Release date7 January 2025 (less than a year ago)24 February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$394$1,544

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores12no data
Threads2040
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)80 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm5 nm
Die size243 mm2598 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1851Intel BGA 4368
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.95 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2032

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2025 24 February 2025
Threads 20 40
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 145 Watt

Ultra 7 265 has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 123.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6516P-B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Xeon 6516P-B. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265 is a desktop processor while Xeon 6516P-B is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265
Intel Xeon 6516P-B
Xeon 6516P-B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6516P-B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 265 and Xeon 6516P-B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.