Ryzen 5 7400F vs Ultra 7 265
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 151 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 42.71 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | January 2025 (recently) | 9 January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 20 (Icosa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1851 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 20 | 6 |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
Ultra 7 265 has 233.3% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265 and Ryzen 5 7400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
