Ryzen 7 260 vs Ultra 7 258V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
10.76
Ryzen 7 260
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
16.20
+50.6%

Ryzen 7 260 outperforms Core Ultra 7 258V by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking821464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency67.8638.60
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameLunar Lake (2024)Hawk Point (2024−2025)
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores4no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads816
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate37 MHzno data
L1 cache192 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2833FP8
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140V GPUAMD Radeon 780M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.95 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.04.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 258V 10.76
Ryzen 7 260 16.20
+50.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 258V 18982
Samples: 1052
Ryzen 7 260 28565
+50.5%
Samples: 210

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 7 258V 9982
+35.2%
Ryzen 7 260 7384

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 7 258V 36479
Ryzen 7 260 45689
+25.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 258V 1597
Ryzen 7 260 2768
+73.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 258V 285
+2.7%
Ryzen 7 260 278

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 7 258V 7.6
Ryzen 7 260 11.4
+50%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 258V 9654
Ryzen 7 260 9848
+2%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 258V 5757
Ryzen 7 260 6439
+11.9%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 258V 35973
Ryzen 7 260 63076
+75.3%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 7 258V 280
+7.3%
Ryzen 7 260 261

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 7 258V 572
+77.6%
Ryzen 7 260 322

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 258V 11008
+8.1%
Ryzen 7 260 10180

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 7 258V 2759
+5.2%
Ryzen 7 260 2622

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.76 16.20
Recency 24 September 2024 6 January 2025
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 260, on the other hand, has a 50.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more threads.

The AMD Ryzen 7 260 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V
AMD Ryzen 7 260
Ryzen 7 260

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 137 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 205 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 7 260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.