i3-330UM vs Ultra 7 255H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 255H
2025
16 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
17.39
+5510%

Core Ultra 7 255H outperforms Core i3-330UM by a whopping 5510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4063333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.08no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency26.430.73
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)24 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$514no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads164
Base clock speed4.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data9
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache24 MB3 MB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2049BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported42

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes2816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 255H 17.39
+5510%
i3-330UM 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 255H 30729
+5559%
Samples: 647
i3-330UM 543
Samples: 56

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ultra 7 255H 2542
+1245%
i3-330UM 189

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ultra 7 255H 13577
+3117%
i3-330UM 422

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.39 0.31
Recency 1 January 2025 24 May 2010
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 18 Watt

Ultra 7 255H has a 5509.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

i3-330UM, on the other hand, has 55.6% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-330UM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 101 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 255H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 8 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 255H and Core i3-330UM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.