Athlon II N330 vs Ultra 7 255H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 255H
2025, $514
16 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
17.47
+4497%

Core Ultra 7 255H outperforms Athlon II N330 by a whopping 4497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4083257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.19no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency26.470.46
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)12 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$514no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads162
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache24 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data234 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCBGA2049S1
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes28no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 255H 17.47
+4497%
Athlon II N330 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 255H 30815
+4534%
Samples: 688
Athlon II N330 665
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.47 0.38
Recency 1 January 2025 12 May 2010
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 35 Watt

Ultra 7 255H has a 4497.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II N330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H
AMD Athlon II N330
Athlon II N330

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 101 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 255H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Athlon II N330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 255H and Athlon II N330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.