i3-9100F vs Ultra 7 251HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 251HX
2026
18 cores / 18 threads
28.50
+627%

Core Ultra 7 251HX outperforms Core i3-9100F by a whopping 627% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2441731
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Core i3
Power efficiencyno data2.48
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HX (2025−2026)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date1 April 2026 (less than a year ago)23 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads184
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache30 MB1 MB
L3 cache30 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) (300 - 1800 MHz)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 251HX 28.50
+627%
i3-9100F 3.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 251HX 48713
+627%
Samples: 2
i3-9100F 6700
Samples: 2912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.50 3.92
Recency 1 April 2026 23 April 2019
Physical cores 18 4
Threads 18 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm

Ultra 7 251HX has a 627% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 350% more physical cores and 350% more threads, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-9100F in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 251HX is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 251HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7720 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 251HX and Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.