i9-14900 vs Ultra 7 165U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.19
Core i9-14900
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
30.35
+171%

Core i9-14900 outperforms Core Ultra 7 165U by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking700137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Uno data
Power efficiency70.6044.19
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-P (2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$448$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1432
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.9 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data219 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 4 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size96 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency2 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.212
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1216
PCI support4.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 165U 11.19
i9-14900 30.35
+171%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 165U 17770
i9-14900 48205
+171%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 165U 1636
i9-14900 4793
+193%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 165U 240
i9-14900 315
+31.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 165U 8577
i9-14900 17395
+103%

Blender(-)

Ultra 7 165U 323
+146%
i9-14900 131

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 165U 1734
i9-14900 2140
+23.4%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 165U 4895
i9-14900 7276
+48.6%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 165U 40306
i9-14900 101652
+152%

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 7 165U 272
i9-14900 315
+15.8%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 7 165U 1528
i9-14900 2133
+39.6%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 7 165U 643
+144%
i9-14900 263

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 165U 9530
i9-14900 15962
+67.5%

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ultra 7 165U 2323
i9-14900 3022
+30.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.19 30.35
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 14 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 165U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

i9-14900, on the other hand, has a 171.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads.

The Core i9-14900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165U in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 165U is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 165U and Core i9-14900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U
Intel Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 93 votes

Rate Core i9-14900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 165U or Core i9-14900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.